References
Barker, D. (2011). Re-imagining Hamlet through tweets. The Teaching Librarian,19(1), 6-17.
Bloom, B.S., (1994). Reflections on the development and use of the taxonomy. In K.J. Rehage, L.W. Anderson, & L.A. Sosniak (Eds.), Bloom’s taxonomy: A
forty-year retrospective, 93(2). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
Bruner, J. (2009). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Choi, I., Hernandez-Serrano, J., & Jonassen, D.H., (2002). Integrating constructivism and learning technologies. In J.M. Spector & T.M. Anderson (Eds.),
Integrated and holistic perspectives on learning, instruction, and technology: Understanding complexity,(103-128). New York: Kluwer Academic
Publishers.
Earl, L. M. (2002). Assessment as Learning. In Hawley, W. D., & Rollie, D. L. (Eds.), The keys to effective schools: educational reform as continuous
improvement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, 85-98.
Hall, G. E., Hord, S. M., Huling-Austin, L., & Rutherford, W. L. (1987). Taking charge of change. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
Huijser, H. (2008). Exploring the educational potential of social networking sites: The fine line between exploiting opportunities and unwelcome imposition.
Studies in Learning, Evaluation, Innovation and Development, 5(3), 45-54.
Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational technology research and development,
39(3), 5-14.
Keller, J.M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of instructional development, 10(3), 2-10.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Mergel, B. (1998). Instructional design and learning theory. Retrieved from http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/mergel/
brenda.htm#Learning
Merchant, G. (2009). Web 2.0, new literacies, and the idea of learning through participation. English teaching: Practice and critique, 8(3), 107-122. Retrieved
from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ869397&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2007). The Ontario curriculum grades 11-12: English. Retrieved from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/
english.html
Puentedura, R. (2010). SAMR and TPCK: intro to advanced practice. Retrieved from http://hippasus.com/resources/sweden2010/
SAMR_TPCK_IntroToAdvancedPractice.pdf
Savery, J. R., & Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational technology, 35(5), 31-38.
Selwyn, N., & Grant, L. (2009). Researching the realities of social software use - an introduction. Learning, Media & Technology, 34(2), 79-86.
Siemens, G. (2005a). Connectivism: learning as network-creation. Retrieved from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/networks.htm
Siemens, G. (2005b). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International journal of instructional technology and distance learning, 2(1), 3-10.
Social Development Theory (Vygotsky) (2010, December). In Learning-Theories.com. Retrieved from http://www.learning-theories.com/vygotskys-social-
learning-theory.html
The New London Group (Cazden, Courtney, Bill Cope, Mary Kalantzis et al.) (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard
Educational Review, 66 (1) 60-92.
Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical assessment, research & evaluation, 2(2). Retrieved August 3, 2012 from http://
PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=2&n=2
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Yancey, Kathleen Blake. (2009) Writing in the 21st Century. National council of teachers of English. 1-9. Retrieved from www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/
Press/Yancey_final.pdf